Document Purpose
Scope: this responsibility agreement / cia / rasic specifies cybersecurity concept and evidence, covering 1 Scope; 1.1 Target readers; 3 Technical content; 3.1 DSC structure; 3.1.1 VerificationEntry; 3.1.2 EncryptionEntry.
CVS154.pdf · Responsibility Agreement / CIA / RASIC · Responsibility / Process
CVS154.pdf · Responsibility Agreement / CIA / RASIC · Responsibility / Process
Systems-engineering read of what this document defines for the system - scope, boundaries, interfaces, obligations, and what is still open.
Scope: this responsibility agreement / cia / rasic specifies cybersecurity concept and evidence, covering 1 Scope; 1.1 Target readers; 3 Technical content; 3.1 DSC structure; 3.1.1 VerificationEntry; 3.1.2 EncryptionEntry.
System boundary and interfaces: the document constrains 1 interface(s) - OEM/Customer Review Interface; principal functions in scope are Security evidence and traceability; Secure communication and freshness protection.
Design and security impact: affects Security evidence and traceability; Secure communication and freshness protection; security capabilities touched: Key management; 7 supplier system requirement(s) were derived from this document.
Open for the customer: 3 document-linked open point(s) - mainly Confirm the exact ECU designation/variant and the agreed item definition and boundary used for the risk analysis (TARA).; Confirm the DIA / responsibility (RASIC/CIA) split for each cybersecurity work product before supplier scope is fixed.; Confirm whether each listed requirement is binding supplier scope, customer-owned scope, or evidence-only context for the ECA ECU baseline - plus 6 unidentified requirement-like statement(s). Do not baseline these until the customer confirms.
Confidence and limits: High confidence. Categorisation is derived from the converted Markdown (customer IDs, normative wording, and section context); no OCR or downstream PDF analysis is used.
| Theme | Engineering Meaning | Requirement Count | Representative Requirements |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cybersecurity concept and evidence | Drives cybersecurity concept, risk treatment, verification evidence, and traceability obligations. | 31 | RFQX-CVS154-0001; RFQX-CVS154-0002; RFQX-CVS154-0006 |
| Responsibility and customer approval model | Creates supplier/OEM allocation decisions for work products, backend infrastructure, approvals, and residual risk. | 25 | RFQX-CVS154-0001; RFQX-CVS154-0002; RFQX-CVS154-0008 |
| System architecture design | Groups related document requirements into a single engineering theme. | 25 | RFQX-CVS154-0003; RFQX-CVS154-0004; RFQX-CVS154-0005 |
| Requirement | Groups related document requirements into a single engineering theme. | 24 | RFQX-CVS154-0008; RFQX-CVS154-0009; RFQX-CVS154-0010 |
| System | Groups related document requirements into a single engineering theme. | 24 | RFQX-CVS154-0003; RFQX-CVS154-0004; RFQX-CVS154-0005 |
| Information | Groups related document requirements into a single engineering theme. | 15 | RFQX-CVS154-0005; RFQX-CVS154-0006; RFQX-CVS154-0007 |
| System core | Groups related document requirements into a single engineering theme. | 15 | RFQX-CVS154-0003; RFQX-CVS154-0004; RFQX-CVS154-0017 |
| Needs clarification | Groups related document requirements into a single engineering theme. | 6 | RFQX-CVS154-0002; RFQX-CVS154-0003; RFQX-CVS154-0004 |
| Section | Requirements | Information | Unknown / Review Needed | Total Items | Critical | Open Points | SSR Links |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Scope | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| -- 1.1 Target readers | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| 3 Technical content | 24 | 15 | 0 | 42 | 8 | 2 | 7 |
| -- 3.1 DSC structure | 13 | 12 | 0 | 28 | 6 | 2 | 4 |
| -- -- 3.1.1 VerificationEntry | 1 | 6 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| -- -- 3.1.2 EncryptionEntry | 3 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 2 |
| -- 3.2 DSC ASN.1 definition | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| -- 3.3 DSC sanity check and verification | 9 | 2 | 0 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| 4 Referenced documents and IT-Systems | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| -- 4.2 Informative references | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
Tables are reconstructed column-correct from the document text layer (no OCR). Diagrams are linked from converted image assets.
Diagram source context
Diagram source context
Diagram source context
Security protocol or cryptographic context
Diagram source context
Diagram source context
Security protocol or cryptographic context
Security protocol or cryptographic context
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Source PDF | CVS154.pdf |
| Document Type | Responsibility Agreement / CIA / RASIC |
| Domain | Responsibility / Process |
| Scope Summary | 24 confirmed requirements, 6 needing clarification, 15 information, 2 reference items; 7 linked SSRs; 3 linked open points. |
| Main Themes | Cybersecurity concept and evidence; Responsibility and customer approval model; System architecture design; Requirement; System (sample: 5 of 8) |
| Does Not Confirm | Customer-owned responsibility, final customer decisions, and unresolved open points remain unconfirmed. |
| Confidence | High |
| Evidence Basis | Markdown-derived requirements and generated RFQX registers; no downstream PDF analysis. |
This table is horizontally scrollable. Use the bottom scrollbar to view all columns.
| ID | Score | Category | Requirement / Reason | Supplier Position |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RFQX-CVS154-0025 | 81 | High risk due to unclear OEM/supplier responsibility | • hashAlgorithm: States which HashAlgorithm (see RFC 6234) shall be used for hashing the data to verify.security relevant; architecture relevant; Needs Customer Clarification; linked open point; blocks SSR derivation | Needs Customer Clarification |
| RFQX-CVS154-0047 | 81 | High risk due to unclear OEM/supplier responsibility | The sequence tags for verificationEntries, encryptionEntries and itemEntries are required but empty (zero length).security relevant; architecture relevant; Needs Customer Clarification; linked open point; blocks SSR derivation | Reference / Document Information |
| RFQX-CVS154-0026 | 80 | High risk due to unclear OEM/supplier responsibility | • dataRanges: sequence of Range items - Range: Information on which data chunks that shall be verified.architecture relevant; Needs Customer Clarification; linked open point; High estimation impact; blocks SSR derivation | Needs Customer Clarification |
| RFQX-CVS154-0002 | 66 | High risk due to unclear OEM/supplier responsibility | Any review of this CVS154 shall only be done in agreement with the involved TRATON Group commercial vehicle Affiliates stated in the table below under section “Technical responsibility”.architecture relevant; Needs Customer Clarification; linked open point; blocks SSR derivation | Needs Customer Clarification |
| RFQX-CVS154-0003 | 66 | High risk due to unclear OEM/supplier responsibility | The User shall apply the latest version of this CVS154.architecture relevant; Needs Customer Clarification; linked open point; blocks SSR derivation | Needs Customer Clarification |
| RFQX-CVS154-0004 | 66 | High risk due to unclear OEM/supplier responsibility | This document shall be used accompanied with these specifications.architecture relevant; Needs Customer Clarification; linked open point; blocks SSR derivation | Needs Customer Clarification |
| RFQX-CVS154-0032 | 66 | High risk due to unclear OEM/supplier responsibility | Range: Information on which data chunks that shall be decrypted.architecture relevant; Needs Customer Clarification; linked open point; blocks SSR derivation | Needs Customer Clarification |
| DSC_BASE_REQ 29 | 48 | High risk due to unclear OEM/supplier responsibility | The server shall support a DSC containing verificationEntries.security relevant; architecture relevant; Partially Accept | Partially Accept |
| DSC_BASE_REQ 45 | 48 | High risk due to unclear OEM/supplier responsibility | The server shall expect an ASN.1 SEQUENCE tag with length zero for verificationEntries that contains no VerificationEntry items in a DSC transmitted by the client.security relevant; architecture relevant; Partially Accept | Partially Accept |
| DSC_BASE_REQ 26 | 48 | High risk due to unclear OEM/supplier responsibility | The server shall support an empty DSC containing only Metadata (version and id) and the empty sequences for verificationEntries, encryptionEntries and ItemEntries.security relevant; architecture relevant; Partially Accept | Partially Accept |
| DSC_BASE_REQ 42 | 48 | High impact on estimation/resources/tools | The server shall have support for the ASN.1 contents as defined: DataSecurityContainer ::= SEQUENCE { version OCTET STRING (SIZE(2)), id OCTET STRING (SIZE(16)), verificationEntries SEQUENCE (SIZE(0..MAX)) OF VerificationEntry, encryptionEntries SEQUENCE (SIZE(0..MAX)) OF EncryptionEntry, itemEntries SEQUENCE (SIZE(0..MAX)) OF ItemEntry } VerificationEntry ::= CHOICE { hashCmp [0] EXPLICIT HashCmp }security relevant; architecture relevant; Needs Internal Review | Needs Internal Review |
| REQ_DSC_BASE_20 | 48 | High risk due to unclear OEM/supplier responsibility | The version shall be verified with the servers supported Major and Minor version of the DSC logic for compliancy.security relevant; architecture relevant; Partially Accept | Partially Accept |
Confirm the exact ECU designation/variant and the agreed item definition and boundary used for the risk analysis (TARA).
Confirm the DIA / responsibility (RASIC/CIA) split for each cybersecurity work product before supplier scope is fixed.
Confirm whether each listed requirement is binding supplier scope, customer-owned scope, or evidence-only context for the ECA ECU baseline.
This table is horizontally scrollable. Use the bottom scrollbar to view all columns.
| Open Point | Priority | Question / Impact | Required Customer Decision | Recommended Supplier Position | Owner | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OP-001 | Confirm the exact ECU designation/variant and the agreed item definition and boundary used for the risk analysis (TARA).TARA scope and effort stay open; downstream assets, goals and design may rework. | Confirm the exact ECU designation/variant and the agreed item definition and boundary used for the risk analysis (TARA). | Proceed on the working ECA-ECU interpretation; flag every TARA-scope statement as assumption until confirmed. | OEM / Customer | Open | |
| OP-009 | Confirm the DIA / responsibility (RASIC/CIA) split for each cybersecurity work product before supplier scope is fixed.Without an agreed DIA the supplier risks owning customer work products or leaving cybersecurity gaps in the case. | Confirm the DIA / responsibility (RASIC/CIA) split for each cybersecurity work product before supplier scope is fixed. | Deliver supplier-owned work products per concept; require a signed DIA/RASIC before treating shared items as supplier scope. | OEM / Customer + Supplier (DIA) | Open | |
| OP-011 | Confirm whether each listed requirement is binding supplier scope, customer-owned scope, or evidence-only context for the ECA ECU baseline.Supplier position, estimation, and affected design allocation remain conditional for the listed requirements. | Decide whether each listed requirement is binding supplier scope, customer-owned scope, or evidence-only context. | Carry the items as customer-confirmation dependencies and review them in the next clarification workshop. | OEM / Customer | Open |
Items carrying a customer requirement ID and a normative (shall/must) statement.
The server shall support a DSC containing verificationEntries. Details & reviewer feedbackSection 3.1 DSC structure Page page 5 Feature / Interface Security evidence and traceability / OEM/Customer Review Interface Supplier proposal Partially accept. Supplier can implement the ECU-side behaviour, but OEM-owned backend/PKI/fleet responsibilities require customer confirmation. |
The server shall expect an ASN.1 SEQUENCE tag with length zero for verificationEntries that contains no VerificationEntry items in a DSC transmitted by the client. Details & reviewer feedbackSection 3.1 DSC structure Page page 5 Feature / Interface Security evidence and traceability / OEM/Customer Review Interface Supplier proposal Partially accept. Supplier can implement the ECU-side behaviour, but OEM-owned backend/PKI/fleet responsibilities require customer confirmation. |
The server shall support an empty DSC containing only Metadata (version and id) and the empty sequences for verificationEntries, encryptionEntries and ItemEntries. Details & reviewer feedbackSection 3.1 DSC structure Page page 5 Feature / Interface Security evidence and traceability / OEM/Customer Review Interface Supplier proposal Partially accept. Supplier can implement the ECU-side behaviour, but OEM-owned backend/PKI/fleet responsibilities require customer confirmation. |
The server shall have support for the ASN.1 contents as defined: DataSecurityContainer ::= SEQUENCE { version OCTET STRING (SIZE(2)), id OCTET STRING (SIZE(16)), verificationEntries SEQUENCE (SIZE(0..MAX)) OF VerificationEntry, encryptionEntries SEQUENCE (SIZE(0..MAX)) OF EncryptionEntry, itemEntries SEQUENCE (SIZE(0..MAX)) OF ItemEntry } VerificationEntry ::= CHOICE { hashCmp [0] EXPLICIT HashCmp } Details & reviewer feedbackSection 3.2 DSC ASN.1 definition Page page 9 Feature / Interface Security evidence and traceability / OEM/Customer Review Interface Supplier proposal Needs internal review. Confirm the extracted wording and the intended scope before committing a supplier position. Related source tables/diagrams are treated as interpretation context, not separate customer IDs. Related Tables / DiagramsLinked tables: 0 | Linked diagrams: 1
|
The version shall be verified with the servers supported Major and Minor version of the DSC logic for compliancy. Details & reviewer feedbackSection 3.3 DSC sanity check and verification Page page 10 Supplier proposal Partially accept. Supplier can implement the ECU-side behaviour, but OEM-owned backend/PKI/fleet responsibilities require customer confirmation. |
The length of key and iv shall be verified accordingly to the algorithm stipulated in EncryptionEntry. Details & reviewer feedbackSection 3.3 DSC sanity check and verification Page page 11 Security capability Key management Supplier proposal Accept. Implement as part of the cybersecurity concept and map to verification evidence, assuming the customer confirms responsibility allocation and method. |
VerificationEntry hashCmp states that a hash comparison shall be used to verify the data. Details & reviewer feedbackSection 3.1.1.1 HashCmp Page page 6 Feature / Interface Security evidence and traceability / OEM/Customer Review Interface Supplier proposal Accept. Implement as part of the cybersecurity concept and map to verification evidence, assuming the customer confirms responsibility allocation and method. Related source tables/diagrams are treated as interpretation context, not separate customer IDs. Related Tables / DiagramsLinked tables: 0 | Linked diagrams: 1
|
For crypto agility reasons, both of the choices shall be supported by the server. Details & reviewer feedbackSection 3.1.2 EncryptionEntry Page page 7 Supplier proposal Accept. Implement the ECA ECU behavior against the mapped feature/interface and verify through supplier test evidence, subject to customer-confirmed responsibility and acceptance criteria. |
The server shall support a DSC Metadata block containing version and id fields. Details & reviewer feedbackSection 3.1 DSC structure Page page 5 Supplier proposal Accept. Implement the ECA ECU behavior against the mapped feature/interface and verify through supplier test evidence, subject to customer-confirmed responsibility and acceptance criteria. |
The server shall support the Major and Minor version as specified in 3.2. Details & reviewer feedbackSection 3.1 DSC structure Page page 5 Supplier proposal Accept. Implement the ECA ECU behavior against the mapped feature/interface and verify through supplier test evidence, subject to customer-confirmed responsibility and acceptance criteria. |
The server shall support a DSC containing encryptionEntries. Details & reviewer feedbackSection 3.1 DSC structure Page page 5 Supplier proposal Accept. Implement the ECA ECU behavior against the mapped feature/interface and verify through supplier test evidence, subject to customer-confirmed responsibility and acceptance criteria. |
The server shall support a DSC containing itemEntries. Details & reviewer feedbackSection 3.1 DSC structure Page page 5 Supplier proposal Accept. Implement the ECA ECU behavior against the mapped feature/interface and verify through supplier test evidence, subject to customer-confirmed responsibility and acceptance criteria. |
The server shall expect an ASN.1 SEQUENCE tag with length zero for encryptionEntries that contains no EncryptionEntry items in a DSC transmitted by the client. Details & reviewer feedbackSection 3.1 DSC structure Page page 5 Supplier proposal Accept. Implement the ECA ECU behavior against the mapped feature/interface and verify through supplier test evidence, subject to customer-confirmed responsibility and acceptance criteria. |
The server shall expect an ASN.1 SEQUENCE tag with length zero for ItemEntries that contains no items in a DSC transmitted by the client. Details & reviewer feedbackSection 3.1 DSC structure Page page 5 Supplier proposal Accept. Implement the ECA ECU behavior against the mapped feature/interface and verify through supplier test evidence, subject to customer-confirmed responsibility and acceptance criteria. |
The server shall support the SHA512 HashAlgorithm as referred in 3.2 ASN1 definition. Details & reviewer feedbackSection 3.1.2 EncryptionEntry Page page 7 Supplier proposal Accept. Implement the ECA ECU behavior against the mapped feature/interface and verify through supplier test evidence, subject to customer-confirmed responsibility and acceptance criteria. |
The initial counter value shall be set to 0 (zero). Details & reviewer feedbackSection 3.1.2 EncryptionEntry Page page 7 Supplier proposal Accept. Implement the ECA ECU behavior against the mapped feature/interface and verify through supplier test evidence, subject to customer-confirmed responsibility and acceptance criteria. Related source tables/diagrams are treated as interpretation context, not separate customer IDs. Related Tables / DiagramsLinked tables: 0 | Linked diagrams: 1
|
The structure version for this document release shall be: Major ‘04’ and Minor ‘00’ Details & reviewer feedbackSection 3.2 DSC ASN.1 definition Page page 9 Supplier proposal Accept. Implement the ECA ECU behavior against the mapped feature/interface and verify through supplier test evidence, subject to customer-confirmed responsibility and acceptance criteria. Related source tables/diagrams are treated as interpretation context, not separate customer IDs. Related Tables / DiagramsLinked tables: 0 | Linked diagrams: 1
|
Upon reception of a DSC to the server, before the DSC is stored in NVM, the DSC shall be semantically verified by parsing all its content. Details & reviewer feedbackSection 3.3 DSC sanity check and verification Page page 10 Feature / Interface Secure communication and freshness protection / None Supplier proposal Accept. Implement the ECA ECU behavior against the mapped feature/interface and verify through supplier test evidence, subject to customer-confirmed responsibility and acceptance criteria. |
The length of the version field shall be verified. Details & reviewer feedbackSection 3.3 DSC sanity check and verification Page page 10 Supplier proposal Accept. Implement the ECA ECU behavior against the mapped feature/interface and verify through supplier test evidence, subject to customer-confirmed responsibility and acceptance criteria. |
The length of the id field shall be verified. Details & reviewer feedbackSection 3.3 DSC sanity check and verification Page page 10 Supplier proposal Accept. Implement the ECA ECU behavior against the mapped feature/interface and verify through supplier test evidence, subject to customer-confirmed responsibility and acceptance criteria. |
The hashAlgorithm shall be supported by the server. Details & reviewer feedbackSection 3.3 DSC sanity check and verification Page page 10 Supplier proposal Accept. Implement the ECA ECU behavior against the mapped feature/interface and verify through supplier test evidence, subject to customer-confirmed responsibility and acceptance criteria. |
The length of every referenceHash shall be consistent with the output size of the hash algorithm specified in the hashAlgorithm. Details & reviewer feedbackSection 3.3 DSC sanity check and verification Page page 11 Supplier proposal Accept. Implement the ECA ECU behavior against the mapped feature/interface and verify through supplier test evidence, subject to customer-confirmed responsibility and acceptance criteria. |
The EncryptionEntry algorithm shall be supported by the server. Details & reviewer feedbackSection 3.3 DSC sanity check and verification Page page 11 Supplier proposal Accept. Implement the ECA ECU behavior against the mapped feature/interface and verify through supplier test evidence, subject to customer-confirmed responsibility and acceptance criteria. |
If the DSC instance is rejected by the server (see Annex A) when transmitted with EMP, an error code shall be returned to the client. Details & reviewer feedbackSection 3.3 DSC sanity check and verification Page page 11 Supplier proposal Accept. Implement the ECA ECU behavior against the mapped feature/interface and verify through supplier test evidence, subject to customer-confirmed responsibility and acceptance criteria. |
Reads like a requirement but no customer requirement ID was identified in the source. Confirm with the customer before baselining — not counted as a confirmed requirement.
• hashAlgorithm: States which HashAlgorithm (see RFC 6234) shall be used for hashing the data to verify. Confirm whether each listed requirement is binding supplier scope, customer-owned scope, or evidence-only context for the ECA ECU baseline. DetailsSection 3.1.2 EncryptionEntry Page page 7 |
• dataRanges: sequence of Range items - Range: Information on which data chunks that shall be verified. Confirm the exact ECU designation/variant and the agreed item definition and boundary used for the risk analysis (TARA). DetailsSection 3.1.2 EncryptionEntry Page page 7 |
Any review of this CVS154 shall only be done in agreement with the involved TRATON Group commercial vehicle Affiliates stated in the table below under section “Technical responsibility”. Confirm the DIA / responsibility (RASIC/CIA) split for each cybersecurity work product before supplier scope is fixed. DetailsSection page-1 Page 1 Page page 1 |
The User shall apply the latest version of this CVS154. Confirm whether each listed requirement is binding supplier scope, customer-owned scope, or evidence-only context for the ECA ECU baseline. DetailsSection page-1 Page 1 Page page 1 |
This document shall be used accompanied with these specifications. Confirm whether each listed requirement is binding supplier scope, customer-owned scope, or evidence-only context for the ECA ECU baseline. DetailsSection 1.1 Target readers Page page 3 |
Range: Information on which data chunks that shall be decrypted. Confirm whether each listed requirement is binding supplier scope, customer-owned scope, or evidence-only context for the ECA ECU baseline. DetailsSection 3.1.2 EncryptionEntry Page page 8 |
Descriptive or contextual statements with a customer ID but no binding (shall/must) wording.
A DSC containing only version and id states that verification and encryption is not to be performed by the server, although the server shall have the support. DetailsSection 3.1.1 VerificationEntry Page page 6 Feature / Interface Security evidence and traceability / OEM/Customer Review Interface |
The verification of servers support of specified dataRanges in the VerificationEntry, shall be stated for the DSC instance. DetailsSection 3.3 DSC sanity check and verification Page page 11 Feature / Interface Security evidence and traceability / OEM/Customer Review Interface |
The verification of servers support of specified dataRanges in the EncryptionEntry, shall be stated for the DSC instance. DetailsSection 3.3 DSC sanity check and verification Page page 11 Feature / Interface Security evidence and traceability / OEM/Customer Review Interface |
The DSC is divided in a metadata header block and three configuration blocks as shown in Figure 2 verificationEntries[..] encryptionEntries[..] itemEntries[..] id version Metadata Figure 2 – DSC structure DetailsSection 3.1 DSC structure Page page 4 Feature / Interface Security evidence and traceability / None Related Tables / DiagramsLinked tables: 0 | Linked diagrams: 2
|
The VerificationEntry is of ASN.1 type CHOICE, where the choice stipulates the verification strategy for a piece of data. DetailsSection 3.1.1 VerificationEntry Page page 6 Feature / Interface Security evidence and traceability / None |
See 3.2 for the context-specific tag number for the VerificationEntry choices. DetailsSection 3.1.1 VerificationEntry Page page 6 Feature / Interface Security evidence and traceability / None |
When the server is instructed to verify the programmed data, in general the following actions are taken by the server. DetailsSection 3.1.1 VerificationEntry Page page 6 |
However, the instance specification may state specialized actions: • Server processes each VerificationEntry one by one. DetailsSection 3.1.1 VerificationEntry Page page 6 Feature / Interface Security evidence and traceability / None |
Definition of hashCmp fields: Refer to Figure 3 for type definitions of each field. DetailsSection 3.1.1 VerificationEntry Page page 6 Feature / Interface Security evidence and traceability / None Related Tables / DiagramsLinked tables: 0 | Linked diagrams: 1
|
An empty DSC issued by client means that in addition to Metadata, the syntax must be correct in accordance with Annex B. DetailsSection 3.1 DSC structure Page page 5 |
See further chapter 3.2 DSC ASN.1 definition for element types. DetailsSection 3 Technical content 3.1 DSC structure Page page 4 Related Tables / DiagramsLinked tables: 0 | Linked diagrams: 2
|
• version: specifies a version of the DSC structure, namely the DSC ASN.1 definition and its elements within the DSC instance. DetailsSection 3.1 DSC structure Page page 5 Related Tables / DiagramsLinked tables: 0 | Linked diagrams: 2
|
The encryptionEntry is of ASN.1 type CHOICE stipulating the decryption strategy for a piece of data. DetailsSection 3.1.2 EncryptionEntry Page page 7 |
See 3.2 for the context-specific tag number for the EncryptionEntry choices. DetailsSection 3.1.2 EncryptionEntry Page page 7 |
An ItemEntry is of ASN.1 type CHOICE, where the choice stipulates the type of item the ItemEntry holds. DetailsSection 3.1.3 ItemEntry Page page 9 Related Tables / DiagramsLinked tables: 0 | Linked diagrams: 1
|
Definitions, abbreviations, document history, scope and other boilerplate. Not customer requirements.
Informative references The sequence tags for verificationEntries, encryptionEntries and itemEntries are required but empty (zero length). DetailsSection 4.2 Informative references Page page 14 Feature / Interface Security evidence and traceability / OEM/Customer Review Interface |
Page 1 Data Security Container base definition Foreword This Commercial Vehicle Standard (“CVS154”) contains requirement specifications for TRATON Group and may be referred to by any of its commercial vehicle Affiliates. DetailsSection page-1 Page 1 Page page 1 |
This table is horizontally scrollable. Use the bottom scrollbar to view all columns.
| SSR | Statement / Trace | Feature | Security Capability | Interface | Responsibility | Status | Verification |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SSR-COM-009 | Secure communication and freshness protection — Secure Communication and Boundary ControlThe ECU shall restrict and protect communication for Secure communication and freshness protection, exposing only OEM-agreed services and applying authenticity/integrity/freshness and boundary controls on allocated signals (IT / backend domain; allocated to Backend and IT Systems).From this PDF: RFQX-CVS154-0036. | Secure communication and freshness protection | None | None | Shared | Blocked by Customer Clarification | Review + Test + table/diagram context review |
| SSR-KEY-001 | Key and Certificate Handling — Key and Certificate HandlingThe ECU shall manage key and certificate material for Key and Certificate Handling across provisioning, storage, use, renewal and revocation per the agreed key lifecycle (Cybersecurity domain; allocated to Security Services; security capability: Certificate handling; interface: OEM/Customer Review Interface).From this PDF: RFQX-CVS154-0044. | Key and Certificate Handling | Certificate handling | OEM/Customer Review Interface | Shared | Blocked by Customer Clarification | Review + Test + table/diagram context review |
| SSR-SYS-001 | System Function — System FunctionThe ECU shall implement the System Function behaviour required by its allocated customer requirements, including the specified functions, signals, states and timing (System domain; allocated to System Core; interface: OEM/Customer Review Interface).From this PDF: RFQX-CVS154-0031; RFQX-CVS154-0034; RFQX-CVS154-0037; RFQX-CVS154-0039; RFQX-CVS154-0041. | System Function | None | OEM/Customer Review Interface | Supplier-Owned | Candidate | Test + table/diagram context review |
| SSR-TOOL-002 | Tooling / IT / Evidence Storage — Tooling / IT / Evidence StorageThe supplier shall provide the tooling, IT infrastructure and evidence storage required for Tooling / IT / Evidence Storage (IT / backend domain; allocated to Backend and IT Systems; interface: OEM/Customer Review Interface).From this PDF: RFQX-CVS154-0008; RFQX-CVS154-0009; RFQX-CVS154-0011; RFQX-CVS154-0012; RFQX-CVS154-0014; RFQX-CVS154-0015; RFQX-CVS154-0027; RFQX-CVS154-0029; RFQX-CVS154-0040; RFQX-CVS154-0043; RFQX-CVS154-0046. | Tooling / IT / Evidence Storage | None | OEM/Customer Review Interface | Shared | Blocked by Customer Clarification | Review + Test + table/diagram context review |
| SSR-TOOL-003 | Tooling / IT / Evidence Storage — Tooling / IT / Evidence StorageThe supplier shall provide the tooling, IT infrastructure and evidence storage required for Tooling / IT / Evidence Storage (Software domain; allocated to Application Software).From this PDF: RFQX-CVS154-0038. | Tooling / IT / Evidence Storage | None | None | Shared | Ready for Customer Alignment | Review + Test + table/diagram context review |
| SSR-VV-001 | Security evidence and traceability — Verification and ValidationThe supplier shall verify and validate Security evidence and traceability per the agreed cybersecurity verification and validation plan (System domain; allocated to System Core; interface: OEM/Customer Review Interface).From this PDF: RFQX-CVS154-0021. | Security evidence and traceability | None | OEM/Customer Review Interface | Supplier-Owned | Candidate | Review + Test + table/diagram context review |
| SSR-VV-002 | Security evidence and traceability — Verification and ValidationThe supplier shall verify and validate Security evidence and traceability per the agreed cybersecurity verification and validation plan (IT / backend domain; allocated to Backend and IT Systems; interface: OEM/Customer Review Interface).From this PDF: RFQX-CVS154-0010; RFQX-CVS154-0013; RFQX-CVS154-0016. | Security evidence and traceability | None | OEM/Customer Review Interface | Shared | Ready for Customer Alignment | Review + Test + table/diagram context review |
| Impact Area | Evidence From This PDF |
|---|---|
| Impacted system features | Secure communication and freshness protection; Security evidence and traceability |
| Impacted interfaces | OEM/Customer Review Interface |
| Impacted security capabilities | Key management |
| Impacted architecture elements | Application Software; Backend and IT Systems; Backend and IT Systems; OEM/Customer Review Interface; Compliance Process; Security Services; System Core; System Core; OEM/Customer Review Interface |
| Impacted work products | Cybersecurity concept; Cybersecurity verification report; DIA / cybersecurity case; Requirement traceability record; System/architecture design |
| Tools / IT / hardware / test | High/High/Low; High/Low/Low; Low/High/Low; Low/High/Medium; Low/Low/Low; Low/Low/Medium; Medium/Low/Medium |
| Design assumptions introduced | Security-relevant requirement the ECU can own once responsibility/method is confirmed. Linked source table/diagram context was considered for interpretation.; Security-relevant requirement the ECU can own once responsibility/method is confirmed. |
| Design decisions required | Confirm with customer whether this is a binding requirement and assign a customer ID. |
| Impact | Status |
|---|---|
| Estimation impact | yes |
| Resource/tool/IT/HW/test impact | High/High/Low; High/Low/Low; Low/High/Low; Low/High/Medium; Low/Low/Low; Low/Low/Medium; Medium/Low/Medium |
Generated from document-specific requirement, traceability, SSR, and open-point evidence.
flowchart LR
doc["CVS154.pdf"]
d0["Key management"]
doc --> d0
f0["Feature: Secure communication and freshness protection"]
doc --> f0
f1["Feature: Security evidence and traceability"]
doc --> f1
i0["Interface: OEM/Customer Review Interface"]
doc --> i0
s0["SSR: SSR-COM-009"]
doc --> s0
s1["SSR: SSR-KEY-001"]
doc --> s1
s2["SSR: SSR-SYS-001"]
doc --> s2
o0["Open point: OP-001"]
doc --> o0
o1["Open point: OP-009"]
doc --> o1
o2["Open point: OP-011"]
doc --> o2
CVS154.pdf
Responsibility Agreement / CIA / RASIC
Responsibility / Process
24 requirements, 15 information, 7 SSRs
0 tables, 8 diagrams
Markdown-derived requirements and registers; OCR disabled; no downstream PDF analysis
This table is horizontally scrollable. Use the bottom scrollbar to view all columns.
| Customer Requirement | SSR | Disposition | Confidence | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RFQX-CVS154-0001 | None | Covered by Existing Supplier System Requirement | n/a | Accepted requirement; covered by a clustered SSR. |
| RFQX-CVS154-0002 | None | Blocked by Customer Clarification | n/a | Needs customer clarification before derivation. |
| RFQX-CVS154-0003 | None | Blocked by Customer Clarification | n/a | Needs customer clarification before derivation. |
| RFQX-CVS154-0004 | None | Blocked by Customer Clarification | n/a | Needs customer clarification before derivation. |
| RFQX-CVS154-0005 | None | Informational Only | n/a | Non-binding; not derived. |
| RFQX-CVS154-0006 | None | Informational Only | n/a | Non-binding; not derived. |
| RFQX-CVS154-0007 | None | Informational Only | n/a | Non-binding; not derived. |
| RFQX-CVS154-0008 | SSR-TOOL-002 | Covered by Existing Supplier System Requirement | Medium | Accepted requirement; covered by a clustered SSR. |
| RFQX-CVS154-0009 | SSR-TOOL-002 | Covered by Existing Supplier System Requirement | Medium | Accepted requirement; covered by a clustered SSR. |
| RFQX-CVS154-0010 | SSR-VV-002 | Shared Responsibility / CIA Needed | Low | Partially accepted; ECU portion mapped, OEM portion needs CIA/RASIC. |
| RFQX-CVS154-0011 | SSR-TOOL-002 | Covered by Existing Supplier System Requirement | Medium | Accepted requirement; covered by a clustered SSR. |
| RFQX-CVS154-0012 | SSR-TOOL-002 | Covered by Existing Supplier System Requirement | Medium | Accepted requirement; covered by a clustered SSR. |
| RFQX-CVS154-0013 | SSR-VV-002 | Shared Responsibility / CIA Needed | Low | Partially accepted; ECU portion mapped, OEM portion needs CIA/RASIC. |
| RFQX-CVS154-0014 | SSR-TOOL-002 | Covered by Existing Supplier System Requirement | Medium | Accepted requirement; covered by a clustered SSR. |
| RFQX-CVS154-0015 | SSR-TOOL-002 | Covered by Existing Supplier System Requirement | Medium | Accepted requirement; covered by a clustered SSR. |
| RFQX-CVS154-0016 | SSR-VV-002 | Shared Responsibility / CIA Needed | Low | Partially accepted; ECU portion mapped, OEM portion needs CIA/RASIC. |
| RFQX-CVS154-0017 | None | Informational Only | n/a | Non-binding; not derived. |
| RFQX-CVS154-0018 | None | Informational Only | n/a | Non-binding; not derived. |
| RFQX-CVS154-0019 | None | Informational Only | n/a | Non-binding; not derived. |
| RFQX-CVS154-0020 | None | Informational Only | n/a | Non-binding; not derived. |
| RFQX-CVS154-0021 | SSR-VV-001 | Covered by Existing Supplier System Requirement | Medium | Accepted requirement; covered by a clustered SSR. |
| RFQX-CVS154-0022 | None | Informational Only | n/a | Non-binding; not derived. |
| RFQX-CVS154-0023 | None | Informational Only | n/a | Non-binding; not derived. |
| RFQX-CVS154-0024 | None | Informational Only | n/a | Non-binding; not derived. |
| RFQX-CVS154-0025 | None | Blocked by Customer Clarification | n/a | Needs customer clarification before derivation. |
| RFQX-CVS154-0026 | None | Blocked by Customer Clarification | n/a | Needs customer clarification before derivation. |
| RFQX-CVS154-0027 | SSR-TOOL-002 | Covered by Existing Supplier System Requirement | Medium | Accepted requirement; covered by a clustered SSR. |
| RFQX-CVS154-0028 | None | Informational Only | n/a | Non-binding; not derived. |
| RFQX-CVS154-0029 | SSR-TOOL-002 | Covered by Existing Supplier System Requirement | Medium | Accepted requirement; covered by a clustered SSR. |
| RFQX-CVS154-0030 | None | Informational Only | n/a | Non-binding; not derived. |
| RFQX-CVS154-0031 | SSR-SYS-001 | Covered by Existing Supplier System Requirement | Medium | Accepted requirement; covered by a clustered SSR. |
| RFQX-CVS154-0032 | None | Blocked by Customer Clarification | n/a | Needs customer clarification before derivation. |
| RFQX-CVS154-0033 | None | Informational Only | n/a | Non-binding; not derived. |
| RFQX-CVS154-0034 | SSR-SYS-001 | Covered by Existing Supplier System Requirement | Medium | Accepted requirement; covered by a clustered SSR. |
| RFQX-CVS154-0035 | None | Needs Internal Review | n/a | Low confidence / human review before derivation. |
| RFQX-CVS154-0036 | SSR-COM-009 | Covered by Existing Supplier System Requirement | Low | Accepted requirement; covered by a clustered SSR. |
| RFQX-CVS154-0037 | SSR-SYS-001 | Covered by Existing Supplier System Requirement | Medium | Accepted requirement; covered by a clustered SSR. |
| RFQX-CVS154-0038 | SSR-TOOL-003 | Shared Responsibility / CIA Needed | Low | Partially accepted; ECU portion mapped, OEM portion needs CIA/RASIC. |
| RFQX-CVS154-0039 | SSR-SYS-001 | Covered by Existing Supplier System Requirement | Medium | Accepted requirement; covered by a clustered SSR. |
| RFQX-CVS154-0040 | SSR-TOOL-002 | Covered by Existing Supplier System Requirement | Medium | Accepted requirement; covered by a clustered SSR. |
| RFQX-CVS154-0041 | SSR-SYS-001 | Covered by Existing Supplier System Requirement | Medium | Accepted requirement; covered by a clustered SSR. |
| RFQX-CVS154-0042 | None | Informational Only | n/a | Non-binding; not derived. |
| RFQX-CVS154-0043 | SSR-TOOL-002 | Covered by Existing Supplier System Requirement | Medium | Accepted requirement; covered by a clustered SSR. |
| RFQX-CVS154-0044 | SSR-KEY-001 | Covered by Existing Supplier System Requirement | Medium | Accepted requirement; covered by a clustered SSR. |
| RFQX-CVS154-0045 | None | Informational Only | n/a | Non-binding; not derived. |
| RFQX-CVS154-0046 | SSR-TOOL-002 | Covered by Existing Supplier System Requirement | Medium | Accepted requirement; covered by a clustered SSR. |
| RFQX-CVS154-0047 | None | Blocked by Customer Clarification | n/a | Needs customer clarification before derivation. |
CVS154.pdfconverted/markdown/source documentScope: this responsibility agreement / cia / rasic specifies cybersecurity concept and evidence, covering 1 Scope; 1.1 Target readers; 3 Technical content; 3.1 DSC structure; 3.1.1 VerificationEntry; 3.1.2 EncryptionEntry. System boundary and interfaces: the document constrains 1 interface(s) - OEM/Customer Review Interface; principal functions in scope are Security evidence and traceability; Secure communication and freshness protection.
Engineering obligations: 24 confirmed customer requirement(s) carry an explicit ID and normative wording and must be implemented and verified; 6 further requirement-like statement(s) have no customer ID and must be clarified before they can be baselined; 15 informational and 2 reference item(s) were separated out as non-binding. Design and security impact: affects Security evidence and traceability; Secure communication and freshness protection; security capabilities touched: Key management; 7 supplier system requirement(s) were derived from this document.
Open for the customer: 3 document-linked open point(s) - mainly Confirm the exact ECU designation/variant and the agreed item definition and boundary used for the risk analysis (TARA).; Confirm the DIA / responsibility (RASIC/CIA) split for each cybersecurity work product before supplier scope is fixed.; Confirm whether each listed requirement is binding supplier scope, customer-owned scope, or evidence-only context for the ECA ECU baseline - plus 6 unidentified requirement-like statement(s). Do not baseline these until the customer confirms. Confidence and limits: High confidence. Categorisation is derived from the converted Markdown (customer IDs, normative wording, and section context); no OCR or downstream PDF analysis is used.
| Field | Interpretation |
|---|---|
| Document Purpose | Scope: this responsibility agreement / cia / rasic specifies cybersecurity concept and evidence, covering 1 Scope; 1.1 Target readers; 3 Technical content; 3.1 DSC structure; 3.1.1 VerificationEntry; 3.1.2 EncryptionEntry. |
| Engineering Interpretation | System boundary and interfaces: the document constrains 1 interface(s) - OEM/Customer Review Interface; principal functions in scope are Security evidence and traceability; Secure communication and freshness protection. |
| Supplier Proposal Impact | Engineering obligations: 24 confirmed customer requirement(s) carry an explicit ID and normative wording and must be implemented and verified; 6 further requirement-like statement(s) have no customer ID and must be clarified before they can be baselined; 15 informational and 2 reference item(s) were separated out as non-binding. |
| System / Security Impact | Design and security impact: affects Security evidence and traceability; Secure communication and freshness protection; security capabilities touched: Key management; 7 supplier system requirement(s) were derived from this document. |
| Customer Clarification Impact | Open for the customer: 3 document-linked open point(s) - mainly Confirm the exact ECU designation/variant and the agreed item definition and boundary used for the risk analysis (TARA).; Confirm the DIA / responsibility (RASIC/CIA) split for each cybersecurity work product before supplier scope is fixed.; Confirm whether each listed requirement is binding supplier scope, customer-owned scope, or evidence-only context for the ECA ECU baseline - plus 6 unidentified requirement-like statement(s). Do not baseline these until the customer confirms. |
| Confidence and Limits | Confidence and limits: High confidence. Categorisation is derived from the converted Markdown (customer IDs, normative wording, and section context); no OCR or downstream PDF analysis is used. |
| Theme | Summary | Requirement Count | Representative Requirements |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cybersecurity concept and evidence | Drives cybersecurity concept, risk treatment, verification evidence, and traceability obligations. | 31 | RFQX-CVS154-0001; RFQX-CVS154-0002; RFQX-CVS154-0006 |
| Responsibility and customer approval model | Creates supplier/OEM allocation decisions for work products, backend infrastructure, approvals, and residual risk. | 25 | RFQX-CVS154-0001; RFQX-CVS154-0002; RFQX-CVS154-0008 |
| System architecture design | Groups related document requirements into a single engineering theme. | 25 | RFQX-CVS154-0003; RFQX-CVS154-0004; RFQX-CVS154-0005 |
| Requirement | Groups related document requirements into a single engineering theme. | 24 | RFQX-CVS154-0008; RFQX-CVS154-0009; RFQX-CVS154-0010 |
| System | Groups related document requirements into a single engineering theme. | 24 | RFQX-CVS154-0003; RFQX-CVS154-0004; RFQX-CVS154-0005 |
| Information | Groups related document requirements into a single engineering theme. | 15 | RFQX-CVS154-0005; RFQX-CVS154-0006; RFQX-CVS154-0007 |
| System core | Groups related document requirements into a single engineering theme. | 15 | RFQX-CVS154-0003; RFQX-CVS154-0004; RFQX-CVS154-0017 |
| Needs clarification | Groups related document requirements into a single engineering theme. | 6 | RFQX-CVS154-0002; RFQX-CVS154-0003; RFQX-CVS154-0004 |
| Section | Requirements | Information | Unknown | Excluded | Total Items | Critical | Open Points | SSR Links |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Scope | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| -- 1.1 Target readers | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| 3 Technical content | 24 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 42 | 8 | 2 | 7 |
| -- 3.1 DSC structure | 13 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 28 | 6 | 2 | 4 |
| -- -- 3.1.1 VerificationEntry | 1 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| -- -- 3.1.2 EncryptionEntry | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 2 |
| -- 3.2 DSC ASN.1 definition | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| -- 3.3 DSC sanity check and verification | 9 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| 4 Referenced documents and IT-Systems | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| -- 4.2 Informative references | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Artifact | Type | Caption | Page | Related Requirements | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DIAGRAM-CVS154-0001 | Diagram | Figure 1 – Specification relationship | page 3 | None | Diagram source context |
| DIAGRAM-CVS154-0002 | Diagram | Figure 2 | page 4 | RFQX-CVS154-0006; RFQX-CVS154-0005; RFQX-CVS154-0007 | Diagram source context |
| DIAGRAM-CVS154-0003 | Diagram | Figure 2 – DSC structure | page 4 | RFQX-CVS154-0006; RFQX-CVS154-0005; RFQX-CVS154-0007 | Diagram source context |
| DIAGRAM-CVS154-0004 | Diagram | Figure 3 – HashCmp | page 6 | RFQX-CVS154-0024; RFQX-CVS154-0021 | Security protocol or cryptographic context |
| DIAGRAM-CVS154-0005 | Diagram | Figure 4 – AESCTR128 | page 7 | RFQX-CVS154-0031 | Diagram source context |
| DIAGRAM-CVS154-0006 | Diagram | Figure 4 – ChaCha20 | page 8 | None | Diagram source context |
| DIAGRAM-CVS154-0007 | Diagram | Figure 5 – Item list | page 9 | RFQX-CVS154-0033; RFQX-CVS154-0034; RFQX-CVS154-0035 | Security protocol or cryptographic context |
| DIAGRAM-CVS154-0008 | Diagram | Figure 6 – DSC sanity check and verification | page 13 | None | Security protocol or cryptographic context |
Customer-owned responsibility, final customer decisions, and unresolved open points remain unconfirmed.
| ID | Score | Category | Reason | Statement |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RFQX-CVS154-0025 | 81 | High risk due to unclear OEM/supplier responsibility | security relevant; architecture relevant; Needs Customer Clarification; linked open point; blocks SSR derivation | • hashAlgorithm: States which HashAlgorithm (see RFC 6234) shall be used for hashing the data to verify. |
| RFQX-CVS154-0047 | 81 | High risk due to unclear OEM/supplier responsibility | security relevant; architecture relevant; Needs Customer Clarification; linked open point; blocks SSR derivation | The sequence tags for verificationEntries, encryptionEntries and itemEntries are required but empty (zero length). |
| RFQX-CVS154-0026 | 80 | High risk due to unclear OEM/supplier responsibility | architecture relevant; Needs Customer Clarification; linked open point; High estimation impact; blocks SSR derivation | • dataRanges: sequence of Range items - Range: Information on which data chunks that shall be verified. |
| RFQX-CVS154-0002 | 66 | High risk due to unclear OEM/supplier responsibility | architecture relevant; Needs Customer Clarification; linked open point; blocks SSR derivation | Any review of this CVS154 shall only be done in agreement with the involved TRATON Group commercial vehicle Affiliates stated in the table below under section “Technical responsibility”. |
| RFQX-CVS154-0003 | 66 | High risk due to unclear OEM/supplier responsibility | architecture relevant; Needs Customer Clarification; linked open point; blocks SSR derivation | The User shall apply the latest version of this CVS154. |
| RFQX-CVS154-0004 | 66 | High risk due to unclear OEM/supplier responsibility | architecture relevant; Needs Customer Clarification; linked open point; blocks SSR derivation | This document shall be used accompanied with these specifications. |
| RFQX-CVS154-0032 | 66 | High risk due to unclear OEM/supplier responsibility | architecture relevant; Needs Customer Clarification; linked open point; blocks SSR derivation | Range: Information on which data chunks that shall be decrypted. |
| RFQX-CVS154-0010 | 48 | High risk due to unclear OEM/supplier responsibility | security relevant; architecture relevant; Partially Accept | The server shall support a DSC containing verificationEntries. |
| RFQX-CVS154-0013 | 48 | High risk due to unclear OEM/supplier responsibility | security relevant; architecture relevant; Partially Accept | The server shall expect an ASN.1 SEQUENCE tag with length zero for verificationEntries that contains no VerificationEntry items in a DSC transmitted by the client. |
| RFQX-CVS154-0016 | 48 | High risk due to unclear OEM/supplier responsibility | security relevant; architecture relevant; Partially Accept | The server shall support an empty DSC containing only Metadata (version and id) and the empty sequences for verificationEntries, encryptionEntries and ItemEntries. |
| Open Point | Priority | Question | Impact | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OP-001 | Confirm the exact ECU designation/variant and the agreed item definition and boundary used for the risk analysis (TARA). | TARA scope and effort stay open; downstream assets, goals and design may rework. | Open | |
| OP-009 | Confirm the DIA / responsibility (RASIC/CIA) split for each cybersecurity work product before supplier scope is fixed. | Without an agreed DIA the supplier risks owning customer work products or leaving cybersecurity gaps in the case. | Open | |
| OP-011 | Confirm whether each listed requirement is binding supplier scope, customer-owned scope, or evidence-only context for the ECA ECU baseline. | Supplier position, estimation, and affected design allocation remain conditional for the listed requirements. | Open |
| SSR | Title | Statement | Reqs From This PDF | Other PDFs | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SSR-COM-009 | Secure communication and freshness protection — Secure Communication and Boundary Control | The ECU shall restrict and protect communication for Secure communication and freshness protection, exposing only OEM-agreed services and applying authenticity/integrity/freshness and boundary controls on allocated signals (IT / backend domain; allocated to Backend and IT Systems). | RFQX-CVS154-0036 | no | Blocked by Customer Clarification |
| SSR-KEY-001 | Key and Certificate Handling — Key and Certificate Handling | The ECU shall manage key and certificate material for Key and Certificate Handling across provisioning, storage, use, renewal and revocation per the agreed key lifecycle (Cybersecurity domain; allocated to Security Services; security capability: Certificate handling; interface: OEM/Customer Review Interface). | RFQX-CVS154-0044 | no | Blocked by Customer Clarification |
| SSR-SYS-001 | System Function — System Function | The ECU shall implement the System Function behaviour required by its allocated customer requirements, including the specified functions, signals, states and timing (System domain; allocated to System Core; interface: OEM/Customer Review Interface). | RFQX-CVS154-0031; RFQX-CVS154-0034; RFQX-CVS154-0037; RFQX-CVS154-0039; RFQX-CVS154-0041 | no | Candidate |
| SSR-TOOL-002 | Tooling / IT / Evidence Storage — Tooling / IT / Evidence Storage | The supplier shall provide the tooling, IT infrastructure and evidence storage required for Tooling / IT / Evidence Storage (IT / backend domain; allocated to Backend and IT Systems; interface: OEM/Customer Review Interface). | RFQX-CVS154-0008; RFQX-CVS154-0009; RFQX-CVS154-0011; RFQX-CVS154-0012; RFQX-CVS154-0014; RFQX-CVS154-0015; RFQX-CVS154-0027; RFQX-CVS154-0029; RFQX-CVS154-0040; RFQX-CVS154-0043; RFQX-CVS154-0046 | no | Blocked by Customer Clarification |
| SSR-TOOL-003 | Tooling / IT / Evidence Storage — Tooling / IT / Evidence Storage | The supplier shall provide the tooling, IT infrastructure and evidence storage required for Tooling / IT / Evidence Storage (Software domain; allocated to Application Software). | RFQX-CVS154-0038 | no | Ready for Customer Alignment |
| SSR-VV-001 | Security evidence and traceability — Verification and Validation | The supplier shall verify and validate Security evidence and traceability per the agreed cybersecurity verification and validation plan (System domain; allocated to System Core; interface: OEM/Customer Review Interface). | RFQX-CVS154-0021 | no | Candidate |
| SSR-VV-002 | Security evidence and traceability — Verification and Validation | The supplier shall verify and validate Security evidence and traceability per the agreed cybersecurity verification and validation plan (IT / backend domain; allocated to Backend and IT Systems; interface: OEM/Customer Review Interface). | RFQX-CVS154-0010; RFQX-CVS154-0013; RFQX-CVS154-0016 | no | Ready for Customer Alignment |